ஞாயிறு, 15 ஆகஸ்ட், 2010

Independence Day

This day we are proud to celebrate our 64th independence day. The day we remember our great freedom fighter's. Hero's of the past. The day we are proud about our culture our tradition etc etc and probably the only day we feel patriotic, may be because the day is a holiday. And we are not consumed with work on this day since it is a national holiday.

I had a long long thought about the actual meaning of independence. Is it independence in expression of thought, speech and action? Is it the independence from exploitation? is it the freedom to decide our own fate?

Was thinking for a long time. We were fighting for Independence effectively from 1885 with the formation of INC. I mean effectively because the struggle for independence actually got channelised only after the formation of INC. Even during that time there were many and many Indians who were supporting the British rule in India. Educated Indians who did not even know they were being looted. Educated Indians who believed that industrial revolution of western Europe will be brought to India by the British.

Most of them did not understand that the industrial revolution of Europe was only possible with the wealth drained from India and if British were not here it would have been there in India with the wealth and resource we had. Once a rich country was hounded by famines after famines, and drain after drain. The farmers, peasants, artisans and all the common men were sucked off their blood, without our self knowing it. Thanks to the drain theory proposed by Dada bhai navroji we came to know it. By that time 200 years of British rule has already passed.

So does independence actually means, independence from this exploitation?

Stats say that there were on an average of around 18000 farmer deaths per year in India between 2002 and 2006 alone. Almost one lakh farmers in just 4 years. And the recent stats are not available on this. Which raises question in me, Are the farmers being exploited by us more than even the British exploited them. Government of India is reluctant to introduce food security bill on a global scale because of lack of availability of enough food grains. so the question still remains.

After the moderate phase of the feroz shah mehta's, dada bhi navoji's, gokale's came the extremist phase of tilak, who roared "swaraj is my birth right and i shall have it". Propounded about self sustainability and home rule. The struggle was carried forward by Gandhiji. He believed in passive resistance, changing the heart of an enemy also by making him understand the rationality of our struggle. There were people in India who changed the heart of even the enemy. Gandhiji was the first one in India to bring the government to a stand still by methods such as hunger strike, darnal, shutdown(bandhs), non-cooperation etc. Still these are the methods used by even the modern day politicians. Probably the only thing they picked up from the freedom struggle.

Along with the non violent freedom fighters were people like bhagat singh, chandra sekhar azad, sukhdev, Netaji subhash chandra bose etc all of whom redefined the term sacrifice and took sacrifices to the next level. Even without the support from the main stream politicians of the congress they did a commendable work in spreading the nationalistic views to the common masses. Finally on this very day 64 years back after a lot of sacrifices and hardships independence was declared. Still there are people in india who attribute the withdrawal of British from India to the loss Britain attained in the second world war. But can we forget the pressure built on the British slowly but steadily by the freedom fighters.

So is it this freedom which allows the people to comment and criticise our own leaders is what independence means. Today there are cases filed against a string of people, some social activists, some political opponents for speaking out what they are not supposed to speak against the modern day government's. Encounters done against civilians for their actions again describing that they are against the government. Do we really have the freedom of expression in this modern day independence era. So the question still remains.

Immediately after the independence there was a huge task ahead for our leaders. To bring back the communal harmony after been torn apart into two countries and all the blood that was spilt. And to create a constitution to hold a country and to take it to the future. A highly commendable work was done indeed, simple proof is the existence of democracy even after 64 years of independence. We have easy references to verify, the way our neighbours perform. Consider our neighbours Pakistan and Bangladesh. Torn ed mostly by military regimes and communal violence's. But still we stand our ground. Secularism, socialism, republic and democracy, we see in the heart of our constitution. And laws are made to reflect these principles.

Is it the freedom that we had shaping up our own future do we call as independence? Yes indeed the future was shaped which promised a lot. All appropriate rights were given. And future laws to be proposed were given directives. One of the directives is to abolish consumption of intoxicating drinks as per article 47. But today the sad state is 25 percent of the state revenue is being generated by the sale of liquor in the state by the state for the people. So the question still remains. What is that we say as independence?

No doubt we had a glorious triumph but are we in the right way of preserving that. Farmer suicides, naxalism, increasing poverty, lack of food security, 8 states declared to be poorer than the mid African states .etc all these issues apart. Imagine if we are born in afghan. Here the right to decide is in our own hands. And we have the obligation of saving the great work done by our freedom fighters. It is to us people to whom this constitution was given and it will be a sin if we forget the obligation we have in our hands. Independence cannot be realised in just celebrating it. It has to be preserved and cherished. So there is a long way to go before we actually realise it

-Jai Hind

Maharajan N

9 கருத்துகள்:

  1. gr8 article..really thought provoking.. expecting answers to ur questions in future.. and miles to go bfore WE sleep..

    ALL THE VERY BEST FOR YOUR FUTURE ENDEAVOURS!!

    பதிலளிநீக்கு
  2. we do nothing for it and keep writing about it or sit abroad thinking about our own future. at least you have a though to serve at least a district by becoming a collector.. consider me and many more who are like me.. we do nothing but still we have the freedom to do nothing for our country..

    there is no one as far as i could have seen without a selfish motive in this world... be it the politicians or be it the naxalites who call themselves fighting for their people.. everyone is selfish.. i always wonder why freedom fighters were not selfish.. might be the cruelty that they faced wiped out the selfish thoughts.. or were they truly selfless.. if they were truly selfless i am sure we should have at least a dozen of them now.. or are the selfless people being diseased with selfish people thoughts?that brings me the thought am i selfish? yes of course i am is the immediate answer that i get..

    so does a better India mean to serve the people and help them.. no it is just showing them the right path.. media be it the print media or the AV media are the ones who have to show the right path.. but again their own selfish motive comes into play here.. it needs at least a single person who cares nothing for his own life and goes out to show the people the right path.. but in this world of modern weapons will he be allowed to do it? never is the answer.. giving a little more thought would give us a way.. it needs a revolution by a group of people.. sounding cinematic isn't it.. but the story of our freedom itself sounds cinematic.. so there is nothing impossible.. it needs a strong belief and heart.. which comes to the answer am i? no is the immediate answer.. hope someone or group of someones makes it possible.. just show the people (including politicians, whom we never consider as people) the right path..

    பதிலளிநீக்கு
  3. @ barani could that it made u think and u sounding emotional. But revolution is never a way and its not going to solve the purpose. And it never will. We have the rights here to question and that in itself is a big weapon. And also to question one need not be selfless, only that he need to be rational. I believe we will be back to the path were we need to be because history says once u raise we fall again and once we fall we will rise again. no doubt.

    பதிலளிநீக்கு
  4. Politics and Movies reflect the society. If both are bad means society is bad. Thats the truth. People dont know to elect good people. If we understand and vote properly, definitely change will happen.

    பதிலளிநீக்கு
  5. @maha yes i guess i was emotional.. tell me when we rose? i dont think that we will raise unless we have cleared the mess we created now. What Gandhiji did was also a revolution.. I believe we will not be in the right path even if we are back to the path.. its so corrupted.. it needs cleaning (not like a hitman).. cleaning of ones thoughts.. you can be selfish but not on the cost of others life/welfare..

    பதிலளிநீக்கு
  6. @ peyarilla Accepted. Would have been great if ur name was there.

    @ barani the time of our independence itself is the time we rose undoubtedly. Corruption is an evil undoubtedly. But there are two faces for that. When one is not giving one cannot take. But that is not as easy as said. But the laws are improving to eradicate that. The RTI act, E governance in various application procedures etc. But since we are not in a position to wait after applying we pay them to get things faster. Accepted the last point. Was some much angry when the scam on duplicate medicines came. But im talking about the general public, most of whom are not that selfish.

    பதிலளிநீக்கு
  7. maha.. good article.. But I did not expect barani to write like these.. A revolutionary in making from canada.. my own analysis on the susbject.. The decline in the indian political and public life can be attributed to a general worldwide decline in the people's interest in 'commons' and public life from 1970s onwords also coinciding with the decline of socialism as a way of life and emergence of technological revolutions. But the fact of the matter is that human in general is a self-seeking and self-interested being. Biologically, even our genes and cells are selfish in nature called 'selfish genes'. But in our social life we are trying to protect our common interest which may come into conflict with the self-interest of some greedy people. So to protect the 'commons' we the people who have such public orientation should capture the institutions of power in this country to drive out the self-seeking from the public life and let them live their own selfish life in their homes.

    பதிலளிநீக்கு
  8. @ramesh well said, but wat about the practicality in doing so. A new movement of self consicousness and rationality have to be started slowly at a ground level which involves educating the people about their rights, the powers that rests in their hands and above all the positives that could be achieved in using those powers in a rightful way. And i suppose bharani is the modern day ghaddar from canada :)

    பதிலளிநீக்கு
  9. @ramesh.. he he he.. why didnt you think that I will write like these? do u think the people with public orientation can do that.. I am sure its gonna be difficult and I dont see it in near future.. Its going to be another struggle.. @maha I am damn sure that I am not made for that. I am not a good leader..

    பதிலளிநீக்கு